Governing Intelligence: Why AI Governance and Explainability Are Reshaping Insurance Workflows

Insuresoft Edge
Stay ahead of the curve with our monthly newsletter, packed with expert insights, the latest insurtech trends, and best practices to keep you competitive. Get exclusive updates on Insuresoft innovations—delivered straight to your inbox. It is central to aligning insurance and risk management goals with long-term profitability and compliance in an evolving landscape.

Walk into any insurance conference this year, and you’ll hear the same buzz: AI is changing everything. It’s in underwriting, claims, and fraud detection. It’s analyzing risk and automating workflows that used to take days. But for every insurer racing to adopt the latest algorithm, there’s a quieter, more important conversation happening—the one about governance.

Because artificial intelligence is as powerful as it is, it introduces a new kind of risk: the risk of not knowing why a decision was made.

For an industry built on trust, compliance, and precision, that’s a problem. The real question for insurers in 2025 isn’t “how fast can we adopt AI?” It’s “how responsibly can we use it?”

Why Governance Matters More Than Speed

Insurers know regulation. They live and breathe compliance frameworks, audit logs, and actuarial rigor. But AI changes the game. Algorithms don’t always explain themselves, and models evolve as data changes. This means that decisions, once governed by policy logic, now depend on mathematical models that few can interpret.

The insurance industry’s long-standing commitment to risk management makes it uniquely positioned to lead in AI governance—but only if that same discipline is applied to its use of technology.

The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act, particularly Article 4, offers an early look at what’s coming. By 2026, organizations in Europe must prove that their teams are AI literate. Non-compliance could cost up to 7% of global revenue. The U.S. isn’t there yet, but the signal is clear: literacy and explainability are no longer academic—they’re strategic.

Governance isn’t about slowing down innovation. It’s about building a foundation that makes innovation sustainable.

From Black Boxes to Glass Boxes

In underwriting, claims, and fraud detection, the temptation to fully automate is understandable. A machine can process thousands of data points in seconds, far beyond human capability. But without proper oversight, those systems can drift, reinforce bias, or make opaque recommendations that can’t be explained when questioned.

“Black box” AI models are efficient until a regulator—or a policyholder—asks why.

That’s where explainability becomes essential. Explainable AI (XAI) provides human-readable insights into how models make decisions. It doesn’t require executives or underwriters to become data scientists, but it does ensure that when an AI suggests denying a claim or adjusting a premium, the reasoning can be shown, tested, and verified.

For underwriters, that means AI is no longer an invisible partner—it’s a transparent one.

Literacy Is the Bridge Between Compliance and Innovation

Compliance used to mean checkboxes. Did you meet the standard? Did you submit the audit? But AI literacy changes the equation. It asks not only whether you complied but whether your people understand what they’re governing.

True literacy equips teams to question, calibrate, and validate AI recommendations.

  • Underwriters learn when to trust the system and when to override it.

  • Claims handlers know how to validate model recommendations before escalation.

  • Executives gain the vocabulary and context to evaluate vendor claims intelligently.

Without literacy, AI is either a risk to be feared or a buzzword that never scales. With it, it becomes a controlled, strategic advantage.

What AI Governance Looks Like in Action

Effective governance isn’t a policy you publish once—it’s a living framework. The insurers leading the way are building governance programs around a few core practices:

  1. Clear ownership
    Every AI system should have a defined owner accountable for its output. Governance fails when everyone assumes someone else is watching.
  2. Version control and model lineage
    Track when a model was updated, who approved it, and what data it used. This creates a chain of custody for every algorithmic decision.
  3. Role-based explainability
    Underwriters don’t need code—they need clarity. Systems should present decision factors in a business-readable format.
  4. Continuous monitoring
    AI models drift over time. Ongoing testing for bias, accuracy, and compliance prevents minor problems from compounding into systemic ones.
  5. Vendor accountability
    Many insurers use third-party models. Governance includes knowing what’s inside those “black boxes” and demanding transparency from providers.

These guardrails don’t stifle innovation—they enable it. They let teams experiment confidently, knowing every system is traceable and defensible.

The Human Element: Why Guardrails Build Trust

AI governance isn’t just about algorithms; it’s about people. Insurers have spent decades building credibility with policyholders, regulators, and partners. Every claim processed, every renewal offered, carries an implicit promise: we stand by our decisions.

That promise doesn’t disappear in an automated world—it becomes even more important.
When a policyholder asks why their rate changed, an insurer should be able to answer clearly, not hide behind technical jargon. When regulators request documentation, compliance teams shouldn’t scramble to reverse-engineer logic from an opaque system.

Guardrails make that possible. They turn AI from a potential liability into an operational strength.

The Readiness Question: Are You Set Up for Explainability?

AI readiness is about more than adopting new tools. It’s about assessing whether your core systems can support transparency, auditability, and data integrity.

Ask these questions:

  • Can your core system log and trace every decision?

  • Do your teams understand how to interpret AI-driven recommendations?

  • Are your data pipelines clean and governed—or fragmented across multiple systems?

  • Does your vendor provide model documentation and explainability by default?

If the answer to any of those is “no,” it’s not a reason to panic—it’s a reason to plan. The companies that start asking these questions now will be the ones prepared when regulators, partners, and customers demand answers later.

Caution Isn’t Conservatism; It’s Confidence

The insurance industry doesn’t have to choose between innovation and safety. It simply has to remember what it’s always done best: manage risk thoughtfully.

AI governance isn’t about avoiding technology—it’s about adopting it responsibly, with clarity, accountability, and trust at the core. The future of underwriting, claims, and policy management won’t belong to those who adopt AI fastest. It’ll belong to those who deploy it wisely.

For insurers evaluating their readiness, start with the basics: audit your systems, educate your teams, and demand transparency from every technology partner.

Because when it comes to AI, it’s not about racing ahead—it’s about moving forward with confidence.

Looking for a core platform designed with governance, auditability, and transparency at its foundation? Explore how Insuresoft’s Diamond platform supports insurers as they evolve responsibly toward an AI-ready future. Learn more at insuresoft.com.